1782 Discovery Blog: International Divorce Finding Hidden Assets Of The Suddenly Asset Poor Billionaire

International high net worth and celebrity divorces often involve disputes over location and control of real property, art, company ownership and investment/bank accounts.  The U.S. offers a very powerful tool for participants in foreign divorce proceedings to...

1782 Discovery Blog: U.S. Courts Remain Spilt On Allowing 28 U.S.C. §1782 Discovery For Private International Arbitration

The U.S. allows parties to non-U.S. litigation proceedings to obtain documents and witness testimony from sources within the U.S., even if such evidence is unobtainable through the home forum’s own discovery procedures.  Types of evidence available include...

Bruce Marks gives interview on channel Russia-24 on the upcoming elections

October 27, 2020 Voice of America. Bruce Marks comments on the upcoming elections. A slim majority of Americans, 52%, approve of the way Trump is handling the economy. The economy has typically been Trump's strongest issue. Presidential approval has been a strong...

UNLOCKING FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN THE UNITED STATES: OBTAINING DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS

The US offers a very powerful litigation tool to parties to foreign legal proceedings to obtain bank records, other documents and witness testimony from sources within the US, even if such evidence is unobtainable through the foreign forum’s own discovery procedures....

Bruce Marks doesn’t preclude the possibility of a future proceedings following the presidential elections – RUSSIAN RT

October 28, 2020 Bruce Marks, former republican Pennsylvania State Senator, gives interview on Prekrasnaya Rossiya - RUSSIAN RT- on Unfair elections and ballot-stuffing. Pennsylvania is the state where Trump won in 2016. Bruce Marks has the reason to believe that the...

A GUIDE TO ITALIAN LAWYERS FOR OBTAINING DOCUMENTS AND TESTAMONIAL EVIDENCE IN THE U.S.FOR USE IN ITALIAN LITIGATION

The U.S. offers a very powerful litigation tool for participants in Italian legal proceedings and arbitrations to obtain bank records, documents and witness testimony from sources within the U.S., even if such evidence is unobtainable through Italian court...

Bruce Marks gives interview on channel – Russia 24

October 19, 2020 The founder and managing member of Marks & Sokolov, LLC, attorney Bruce Marks gave an interview to Russia 24 on the upcoming elections. He believes that the relations between Russia and the United States could get worse. Watch the interview

Bruce Marks comments on recently declassified documents established that Obama’s administration was engaged in developing a “Russia hoax” to attack Trump -RIA News

October 9, 2020 President Trump’s Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe recently declassified documents, including notes of former Obama CIA director John Brennan, that revealed the CIA had obtained intelligence by September 2016 that then presidential...

1782 Discovery: Marks&Sokolov Enforces Protective Order Against BuzzFeed

28 U.S.C. §1782 allows participants in international legal proceedings to obtain bank records, documents and witness testimony from sources within the U.S., even if such evidence is unobtainable through the international forum’s court procedures.  This procedure...

1782 Discovery Blog: Marks & Sokolov Enforces Protective Orders In International Discovery

The U.S. offers a very powerful litigation tool for participants in international legal proceedings to obtain bank records, documents and witness testimony from sources within the U.S., even if such evidence is unobtainable through the home forum’s court...

Some advice from victims of voter fraud who won the day

by | Jun 22, 2020 | M&S in Press | 0 comments

June 11, 2020

By Bruce S. Marks and Mike Roman

“El Nuevo Metodo de Votar.”  The year was 1993.  Control of the Pennsylvania state Senate turned on a special election in Philadelphia.  Although the district was heavily Democratic, the Republican was running a strong campaign, with organized labor and minority support.  In desperation, the Democratic machine’s operatives descended on the District to steal the election by manipulating Latino voters into signing absentee ballot applications, falsely claiming a “new method of voting” — voting absentee for convenience — then illegal in Pennsylvania if one could go to the polls.  Democratic city election officials then illegally provided the ballots to the operatives directly — instead of mailing them — to “help” voters in choosing their candidate and allowing operatives to return the ballots themselves — again illegal. 

Campaign workers were paid for each absentee ballot application and illegal vote harvested.  In some cases, workers voted the ballots without the voters even seeing them.  Hard to believe?  After months of legal battle, a federal judge issued a landmark decision finding that candidate William Stinson and the Philadelphia city officials engaged in massive fraud involving thousands of illegal votes, removed the Democrat from office, and instated the rightly elected Republican as senator.  A dozen campaign workers were convicted of election fraud.  We should know.  Bruce Marks was the candidate, and Mike Roman ran his ballot security operation.

Since 1993, many states have tried to increase voter participation by allowing mail ballots for all voters — not just those away from polling places on Election Day or having medical reasons.  Today, some states essentially conduct all voting by mail.  There are strong arguments against universal mail voting.  For one, it encourages voting too early.  Take this year’s California Democratic primary, where hundreds of thousands of votes were cast for Amy Klobuchar and other candidates before they dropped out on election eve.  Mail voting also marginalizes Election Day “politicking” and may delay results.  These problems are even greater than the threat of election fraud.  States like Pennsylvania require ballots to be mailed or given to voters directly or through family members and returned through the same means.  This prevents voters from harassment and undue influence. 

In contrast, some states allow “ballot-harvesting” — the dubious practice by which political operatives are permitted to visit voters and pick up and return their ballots.  Needless to say, this greatly increases the threat of improper pressure.  For obvious reasons, states prohibit campaign workers inside voting booths.  Why should workers be permitted to “assist” in voting and returning mail ballots from home?  Foxes do not belong in henhouses.  But this is what happens; once ballots are mailed, workers knock on doors and pester voters to return them filled in the “right” way, with no safeguards.  Already in Texas, harvesters, known as “politiqueras,” have been convicted for bribing voters with cigarettes, beer, and even drugs to get control of their ballots.  In Florida, misconduct by “boleteros” — balloteers — in Miami resulted in legislative reform limiting third parties from possessing absentee ballots.  Most recently, in 2019, a Republican operative was arrested for improper harvesting in a North Carolina congressional election.

Now Democrats are claiming that ballot-harvesting is needed due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the 2020 election.  Nothing could be more untrue.  Already, the U.S. Postal Service has alerted New Jersey election officials of thousands of “harvested” ballots being dumped in mailboxes while voters report ballots being stolen from their homes.  America does not need politiqueras, boleteros, and other paid-by-the-vote mercenaries interfering in ballot integrity, pressuring voters, and violating social distancing standards.

“Get rid of ballot harvesting, it is rampant with fraud,” President Trump recently tweeted.  He should know.  In 1994, Trump headlined a re-election fundraiser for Bruce Marks and learned all about “El Nuevo Metodo de Votar.”  It stuck with him.  Let’s not repeat these mistakes in the 2020 election.  If citizens wish to vote by mail, there need to be safeguards in place.  Do not literally open the doors of voters to allow ballot harvesting to steal the presidential election in the guise of increased participation.

Bruce S. Marks is a former state senator from Pennsylvania and represented the Trump campaign in the 2016 election.  Mike Roman is director of Election Day operations for the 2020 Trump campaign.

Read the article at American thinker